SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12953

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
SIDDIQ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 285 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.T.K.SANDEEP, SMT.RESHMA VISWANATHAN

A writ petition can be dismissed if the petitioner chooses not to pursue the case, indicating procedural compliance.

Headnote:The petitioner sought relief under WP(CRL.) NO. 285 OF 2026. The petitioner indicated non-pursuance of the case. The court observed that the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. The State of Kerala and its officials were named as respondents. The decision is a procedural outcome without a substantive examination.

Devan Ramachandran, J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that his client is not pressing this writ petition.

Hence, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top