Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
MANU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5374 OF 2020 | CC NO.1778 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NANDAGOPAL S.KURUP
For the Respondents: SRI SUDHEER.G

Withdrawal of petition allows challenges in trial court proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Crl.M.C. No. 5374 of 2020, where the petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, allowing for challenges to be raised in the Trial Court. The court granted permission for withdrawal, concluding that the petition stands closed as withdrawn.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the Crl.M.C., leaving open the option to raise all challenges before the Trial Court. Permission is granted.

The petition stands closed as withdrawn.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12955

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG.GIRISH, JMANU – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentCRL.MC NO. 5374 OF 2020 | CC NO.1778 OF 2018

Withdrawal of petition allows challenges in trial court proceedings.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to Crl.M.C. No. 5374 of 2020, where the petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition, allowing for challenges to be raised in the Trial Court. The court granted permission for withdrawal, concluding that the petition stands closed as withdrawn.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
MANU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.MC NO. 5374 OF 2020 | CC NO.1778 OF 2018