Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12957

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
N.K.SREEDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
P.K.PRABHAKARAN – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 1368 OF 2013

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.B.KRISHNAN, SHRI.R.PARTHASARATHY

Revision petition abated due to the death of the petitioner, with no legal representatives pursuing the matter.

Headnote:The judgment arises from a Criminal Revision Petition regarding the abatement of the appeal due to the petitioner's death. The court noted that no legal representatives were interested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the court concluded that the case is closed due to abatement as per the circumstances presented.

O R D E R

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is no more, and that the legal representatives are not interested in proceeding with this matter.

In the light of the aforesaid submission, the Crl.R.P. is closed as abated by the death of the revision petitioner.

(Sd/-)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12957

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMG.GIRISH, JN.K.SREEDHARAN – AppellantVersusP.K.PRABHAKARAN – RespondentCRL.REV.PET NO. 1368 OF 2013

Revision petition abated due to the death of the petitioner, with no legal representatives pursuing the matter.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G.GIRISH, J
N.K.SREEDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
P.K.PRABHAKARAN – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO. 1368 OF 2013