Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JINACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
GAUTHAM RAJ – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 285 OF 2026|WP(C)NO.42673 OF 2023

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.Krishna Raja Mauli
For the Respondents: Sunil Nath

Compliance with court directions in contempt cases results in closure of proceedings.

Headnote:This contempt case reviews the compliance with directions from judgment dated 04.07.2025 in W.P.

(C) No.42673 of 2023. The court finds that compliance was confirmed by the Government Pleader, stating adherence to the order dated 21.02.2026, leading to the closure of the case. The court concludes: 'The Contempt of Court Case would stand closed.'

J U D G M E N T

The learned Government Pleader states that the direction in the judgment dated 04.07.2025 in W.P.(C) No.42673 of 2023 has been complied with pursuant to an order dated 21.02.2026. A copy of the aforementioned order has also been handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner herein.

In the light of the above, the Contempt of Court Case would stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12960

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMHARISANKAR V. MENON, JJINACHANDRAN – AppellantVersusGAUTHAM RAJ – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 285 OF 2026|WP(C)NO.42673 OF 2023

Compliance with court directions in contempt cases results in closure of proceedings.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
JINACHANDRAN – Appellant
Versus
GAUTHAM RAJ – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 285 OF 2026|WP(C)NO.42673 OF 2023