O R D E R

This is a petition filed seeking review of the judgment of this Court dated 05.02.2026 in W.P. (C) No.19573 of 2023.

2. I have heard Smt.C.K.Sherin, the learned counsel for the review petitioner, as well as Sri.N.B.Sunil Nath, the learned Government Pleader.

3. The review petitioner has pointed out that there are certain errors in the first paragraph as well as in the concluding paragraph of the judgment.

4. As regards the first paragraph, this Court has recorded that the property concerned was described as a converted land in the BTR. Actually, this was recorded as converted land in the “data bank”. Therefore, the first paragraph of the judgment dated 05.02.2026 would stand corrected and the sentence “it was included as converted land in the BTR” is to be read as “it was included as converted land in the data bank”.

5. Secondly, the petitioner points out that the properties covered in Sy. Nos.182/2-C2 and 182/2-C3 have already been removed from the data bank, as they were converted prior to 2008 while passing Ext.P2 order. In view of the afore, there is no requirement for setting aside Exts.P2 and P5 in their entirety. It is made clear that Exts.P2 and P5 would stand set as