Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PRASAD – Appellant
Versus
REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6777 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court is addressing the petitioner's adverse pcc decision. (Para 1) |
| 2. legal argument presented by the 1st respondent regarding pcc issuance. (Para 2) |
| 3. court ordered issuance of a customized pcc. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is aggrieved as the 1st respondent has not considered his request for a Police Clearance Certificate (PCC)
favourably.
2. The learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent would submit that the petitioner is involved in a criminal case and therefore, only a Customised PCC can be issued, and that too only on orders from this Court.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned DSGI appearing for the 1st respondent and having perused Ext.P2 order of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-I, Varkala, this writ petition is disposed of directing the 1st respondent to issue a Customized PCC to the petitioner also mentioning the details of the case mentioned in Ext.P2 order. The needful shall be done within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
