Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BIBIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24668 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ABHIJITH SREEKUMAR, SHRI.PRAMOD B., SHRI.KIRAN RAJ R., SHRI.SIJIN K RAJ, SHRI.SAI KRISHNAN UNNITHAN V., SHRI.TITTU JOSE CHACKANAD, SMT.KRISHNAPRIYA SANTHOSH, SHRI.JAYAMOHAN P.K., SHRI.AKSHAY BABURAJ
For the Respondents: ADV.O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The court upheld the procedural validity of a petition withdrawal allowing dismissal.

Headnote:The petitioner's counsel requested to withdraw the writ petition, leading the court to permit the withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn in accordance with procedural requisites. The court acknowledged the withdrawal was duly requested and upheld. The dismissal reflects the procedural compliance required in such matters.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE bpr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JBIBIN – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – RespondentWP(C) NO. 24668 OF 2025

The court upheld the procedural validity of a petition withdrawal allowing dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BIBIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 24668 OF 2025