BIBIN vs UNION OF INDIA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12977

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BIBIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.ABHIJITH SREEKUMAR, SHRI.PRAMOD B., SHRI.KIRAN RAJ R., SHRI.SIJIN K RAJ, SHRI.SAI KRISHNAN UNNITHAN V., SHRI.TITTU JOSE CHACKANAD, SMT.KRISHNAPRIYA SANTHOSH, SHRI.JAYAMOHAN P.K., SHRI.AKSHAY BABURAJ
For the Respondents: ADV.O.M.SHALINA, DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is granted. Accordingly, the Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.

JUDGE bpr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12977

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMMOHAMMED NIAS C.P., JBIBIN – AppellantVersusUNION OF INDIA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
BIBIN – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent