Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
AJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS PARTY (I) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. execution petition delayed due to obstruction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. report highlights delays from external interference. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directs expeditious handling of matters. (Para 4) |
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is the decree holder in O.S No.454 of 2010 on the files of the Court of the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Nedumangad. The suit was decreed on 16.07.2014 and the appeal and the second appeal filed were dismissed confirming the judgment and decree. The petitioner filed E.P No.70 of 2014 for execution of the decree and the 1st respondent E.A No.119 of 2024 claiming that they are in possession of the decree schedule properties and the decree is not executable.
2. This original petition is filed contending that the petitioner is physically sick and the matter is being prolonged and he prays for a direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) to dispose of E.A No.119 of 2024 and E.P No.70 of 2014 in O.S No.454 of 2010, as expeditiously as possible, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. It is submitted that though an early posting petition has been filed as Ext.P2 before the Execution Court, the same is not so far considered.
3. On 04.02.2026, this Co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
