SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12983

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN, J
K.K.PRAVENI D/O. KRISHNAN – Appellant
Versus
E.N.PURUSHOTAMAN S/O. NANU – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI. ASWIN GOPAKUMAR, SRI. ANWIN GOPAKUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI. A.V.THOMAS (SR.), SRI. JOJO GEORGE, SRI. NIDHI SAM JOHNS, SRI. P.B KRISHNAN (SR.), SMT. GEETHA P.MENON, SRI. P.M NEELAKANDAN, SRI. P.B.SUBRAMANYAN, SMT. CHINCY GOPAKUMAR, SRI. B.GOPAKUMAR

JUDGMENT

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the appellant that there is no instruction from the appellant in spite of registered notice sent and the appeal may be dismissed for non prosecution. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. Pending interlocutory applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top