Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED FAVAS ABBAS – Appellant
Versus
SREEJITH S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 300 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.16312 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.K.SOYUZ, SRI.E.V.BABYCHAN
For the Respondents: GP SMT DEEPA V

Non-compliance leading to contempt is resolved by confirmation of compliance with prior judgment directives.

Headnote:The judgment analyzes the compliance with the directions provided in a previous judgment (WP

(C) NO.16312 OF 2025) dated 16.04.2025. The court notes that the learned Government Pleader indicated full compliance, thus resolving the contempt case without any further directives. Ultimately, the case is closed based on this compliance.

JUDGMENT

When this contempt case came up for consideration, the learned Government Pleader submitted that the directions in the judgment dated 16.04.2025 is complied with.

If that is the case no further direction is necessary.

Therefore, this contempt case is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12987

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, JMUHAMMED FAVAS ABBAS – AppellantVersusSREEJITH S – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 300 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.16312 OF 2025

Non-compliance leading to contempt is resolved by confirmation of compliance with prior judgment directives.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
MUHAMMED FAVAS ABBAS – Appellant
Versus
SREEJITH S – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 300 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.16312 OF 2025