IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JITHIN FRANCY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6339 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. seeks a writ of mandamus for application consideration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court scheduler directives for report and consideration. (Para 3 , 4) |
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to consider and pass order on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other writ, order or direction to the 5th respondent to submit a report to the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act within a time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Court.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 6th respondent to file a report before the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act and 5th respondent with regard to nature and lie of the petitioner’s property in 2008.
iv) To dispense with the production of the translation of vernacular documents.
v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case ."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form – 5 application within a time frame.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P3 application within a time frame.
Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:
1. The 5th respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P3 application to the 3rd respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.
2. The 3rd respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext.P3 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 5th respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the report.
3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 3rd and 5th respondents for compliance.
Sd/-
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE AJ
PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED
Judgment reserved
NA
Date of Judgment
23.02.2026
Judgment dictated
23.02.2026
Draft judgment placed
23.02.2026
Final Judgment uploaded
24.02.2026
16.11.2023 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF DATA BANK Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF THE FORM 5 APPLICATION DATED
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.