IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
JITHIN FRANCY – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"i) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other writ, order or direction to 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act to consider and pass order on Ext.P3 application within a time frame fixed by this Hon'ble Court.
ii) Issue a writ of mandamus or other writ, order or direction to the 5th respondent to submit a report to the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act within a time frame fixed by the Hon’ble Court.
iii) Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 6th respondent to file a report before the 2nd respondent or the officer authorized under section 2(XVA) of the Act and 5th respondent with regard to nature and lie of the petitioner’s property in 2008.
iv) To dispense with the production of the translation of vernacular documents.
v) Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case ."
[SIC]
2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P3 Form
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.