The court emphasizes the necessity for timely governmental action on administrative applications to ensure the rights of petitioners are upheld.

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"a)Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1st respondent RDO to dispose of Ext P6 Form 5 application submitted by the petitioner expeditiously at any rate within a time frame to be fixed by this Hon’ble Court;

b)Such other or further orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem just and fit in the circumstances of the case; and c)Dispense with production of English translation of vernacular documents. "

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P6 Form – 5 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P6 application within a time frame. Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 3^rd respondent is directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P6 application to the 1^st respondent/Authorised O expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 1^st respondent/Authorised O consider Ext.P6 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 3^rd respondent, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 1^st and 3^rd respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE AJ

25.09.2025 Exhibit P3 TRUE COPY OF POSSESSION CERTIFICATE DATED