Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
T.E. Sirajudeen – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14205 OF 2018

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: G. Krishna Kumar
For the Respondents: Preetha K K

A writ petition is dismissed as infructuous when the grounds for appeal or relief are no longer valid.

Headnote:The writ petition deals with the legal framework for local governance matters under relevant town planning regulations. The court noted that the petitioners claimed their prayers have become infructuous, leading to the dismissal of the case as such. The court ultimately concluded with the ruling of dismissal of the writ petition, recognizing the lack of ongoing grievances to address.

JUDGMENT

When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the prayers in this writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 12993

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMP.V. Kunhikrishnan, JT.E. Sirajudeen – AppellantVersusState of Kerala – RespondentWP(C) NO. 14205 OF 2018

A writ petition is dismissed as infructuous when the grounds for appeal or relief are no longer valid.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V. Kunhikrishnan, J
T.E. Sirajudeen – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 14205 OF 2018