SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13005

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
T.R.RAVI, J
S.V. ABDUL HAMEED – Appellant
Versus
STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.E.N.VISHNU NAMBOODIRI, SHRI.P.SANKARAN NAMPOOTHIRI, SRI.M.K.SASEENDRAN, SHRI.NARAYANAN P POTTY
For the Respondents: SHRI.P.GOPAL, SRI.T.V.JAYAKUMAR NAMBOODIRI

JUDGMENT

The only prayer in this original petition is to stay further proceedings in EP.No.65 of 2012 in OS.No.147 of 2010 pending before the Sub Court, Payyannur for a period of two months to facilitate the petitioner to file an application under Order 21 Rule 90 of Civil Procedure and an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act .

2. The original petition was filed on 19.09.2025 and the period of two months sought for has already elapsed. This Court had stayed the confirmation of the sale pursuant to Ext.P5 for a period of one month on 23.09.2025 and the said order is being extended.

3. In the above circumstances, this original petition is disposed of directing the Sub Court, Payyannur to keep further proceedings in abeyance for a further period of two weeks. If the petitioner files any application as stated in prayer No.1 within the aforesaid period of two weeks, the same shall be considered and orders passed.

Sd/-

T.R.RAVI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top