SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
V.NANDANAN – Appellant
Versus
M PADMANABAN – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY
For the Respondents: -

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has filed this contempt case alleging non-compliance of the directions in the judgment dated 25.02.2025 in WP(C) No.6451 of 2021.

2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned Counsel appearing for the 1st respondent submits that based on the report of the Town Planner, the matter was considered and Annexure R1(d) proceedings have been initiated, wherein the petitioner was directed to demolish the unauthorised constructions made by him.

In view of the above directions, this Court is satisfied that the impugned judgment has been complied with. Accordingly, the contempt case stands closed, leaving it open to the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid proceedings in accordance with law, if so aggrieved.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top