Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
V.P.SOMAN – Appellant
Versus
ABRAHAM – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2177 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.26609 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.R.ANILKUMAR
For the Respondents: SHRI.JOMY GEORGE, SHRI.R.PADMARAJ, SRI.M.J.BENNY, SMT. CHITRA N. DAS, SHRI.RISHAB S., SMT.RONA ANN SIBY, SHRI.ASWIN ASHOK V.

The court upholds the principle that a contempt case can be dismissed if the petitioners choose not to pursue it.

Headnote:This judgment pertains to CON.CASE

(C) NO. 2177 OF 2023 against an earlier order dated 30.08.2022 in WP

(C) NO.26609 OF 2022. The court found that the petitioners did not wish to pursue the contempt action, leading to the dismissal of the case. The primary issue before the court centered upon the request to withdraw the case, which was accepted as presented. The court dismissed the case as not pressed, concluding the matter.

JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter is not pressed.

Accordingly, the contempt of court case is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13010

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JV.P.SOMAN – AppellantVersusABRAHAM – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 2177 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.26609 OF 2022

The court upholds the principle that a contempt case can be dismissed if the petitioners choose not to pursue it.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
V.P.SOMAN – Appellant
Versus
ABRAHAM – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2177 OF 2023 | WP(C) NO.26609 OF 2022