SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13011

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
MRPN MINORITY SHAREHOLDERS CUSTOMERS WELFARE ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.NEBIL NIZAR, SHRI.N.KRISHNA MOORTHY, SHRI.AKHIL J CHANDRAN
For the Respondents: O.M.SHALINA

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court with the specific grievance that no further proceedings have been initiated based on the final investigation report submitted by the 3rd respondent.

2. The learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, on instructions, submits that criminal complaints have already been preferred before the Additional Sessions Court, Ernakulam and that they are also initiated proceedings for winding up of the Company, which may require another 4 weeks.

Recording the said submission, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top