Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
T.R. SOLYMOL @ SOLY SANTHOSH – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HARIJAN WELFARE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32111 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: DR.V.N.SANKARJEE, SHRI.V.N.MADHUSUDANAN, SRI.K.S.SOJI SOLAMAN, SMT.R.UDAYA JYOTHI, SRI.M.M.VINOD, SMT.M.SUSEELA, SMT.KEERTHI B. CHANDRAN, SHRI.VIJAYAN PILLAI P.K., SMT.KRIPA KRISHNA, SMT.SUKANYA S., SRI.C.PURUSHOTHAMAN NAIR, SRI.NITHEESH.M
For the Respondents: SMT.MARY BENJEMIN, SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN, SMT.S.INDU, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN, SMT.SANDHRA.S

The court held that a loan account closure negates the necessity for compliance with prior directives related to title deeds.

Headnote:The writ petition sought to quash Ext.P5, which directed the petitioners to settle dues and return a title deed. The respondent's counsel stated the loan account was closed and the title deeds were received. Thus, the petition was dismissed as no further actions were necessary. The court concluded that the directive under Ext.P5 would not be enforced against the petitioners as it was satisfied that the loan was resolved. The writ petition is thus closed with a directive for no proceedings based on Ext.P5.

Table of Content
1. seeking to quash a directive regarding loan dues. (Para 1)
2. response to the court regarding resolution of loan account. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The above writ petition is filed seeking to quash Ext.P5 whereby a direction was issued to the petitioners to settle the dues with the bank and return the title deed to the 5^th respondent, failing which appropriate proceedings will be initiated against them.

2. The learned counsel for the 5^th respondent would submit that the loan account has already been closed and that she has received the title deeds.

In the light of the above submission, nothing survives in this writ petition and is accordingly closed, making it clear that no further proceedings pursuant to Ext.P5 shall be initiated against the petitioners.

Sd/-

VIJU ABRAHAM JUDGE sm/

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13013

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMVIJU ABRAHAM, JT.R. SOLYMOL @ SOLY SANTHOSH – AppellantVersusTHE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HARIJAN WELFARE – RespondentWP(C) NO. 32111 OF 2022

The court held that a loan account closure negates the necessity for compliance with prior directives related to title deeds.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
T.R. SOLYMOL @ SOLY SANTHOSH – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF HARIJAN WELFARE – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 32111 OF 2022