IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
K.S. RAJALAKSHMI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Petitioners have approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order of the 2nd respondent.
2. Petitioners 1 and 2 are members and 3rd petitioner is the former Secretary of the Vellanad Grama Panchayat. The 2nd respondent as per Ext.P4 order finding that the Grama Sabha was not chaired by the President and the same was chaired by the standing committee Chairman, which was found to be against the statute, directed the petitioners to attend a training programme conducted by KILA. Petitioners submit that the 2nd respondent has no power to issue any such direction. It is further submitted that the term of petitioners 1 and 2 is already over and the 3rd petitioner has already retired from service.
Therefore, there is no purpose in the petitioners undergoing any training as directed in Ext.P4. Further, I am of the view that the 2nd respondent cannot issue such directions especially when petitioners 1 and 2 were not arrayed as parties to the proceedings and no notice was issued to them. Taking into consideration the above facts and circumstances, I am inclined to interfere with Ext.P4. Accordingly, Ext.P4 is set aside.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.