J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 23^rd day of February, 2026

Soumen Sen, C. J.

Heard Mr. Anil Thomas, learned counsel for the appellant, Mr. Millu Dandapani, learned counsel for the 2^nd respondent and Mr. Bijoy Chandran, learned Senior Government Pleader.

2. The appellant/writ petitioner is aggrieved by the judgment dated 13.08.2025 in W.P. (C) No. 38799 of 2024 filed by him praying inter alia for a direction upon the 2^nd respondent to calculate the amount due to the appellant in terms of the judgment passed in W.P. (C) No. 13125 of 2022 dated 05.08.2022 and also for stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Exts. P10 and P11 notices issued by the 2^nd respondent till final modification of the amount as per Ext. P6 calculation made by the appellant which is due to him. Exts. P10 and P11 refers to letters issued to the appellant stating that it is not possible to extent the time limit for completion of the sale and a direction upon the appellant to remit 55 percent of the total sale amount being the 1^st and 2^nd 2026:KER:16228 instalment on or before 25.10.2024.

3. During the pendency of the appeal, more than once, opportunities were given to the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 7.5 crores