Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ASWIN B. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DR.SADIQ A. – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 420 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.3280 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SRI.T.S.SARATH, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SRI.MANOJ RAJAGOPAL, SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON, SMT. AASHI K. SHAJAN, SHRI.HAFEEZ MUHAMMED, SMT.BINITHA MARIA THOMAS, SMT.AKZA SUSAN BENCY
For the Respondents: SMT.NISHA GEORGE

Petitioner has the right to revive the contempt case as circumstances warrant.

Headnote:This contempt case was presented for admission and was subsequently not pressed by the petitioner, who reserved the right to revive it if necessary. The court closed the case, allowing the petitioner liberty to take action in the future.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the contempt case for the time being.

Reserving the liberty of the petitioner to revive the same if circumstances so warrant, this contempt of court case is closed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JASWIN B. RAJ – AppellantVersusDR.SADIQ A. – RespondentCON.CASE(C) NO. 420 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.3280 OF 2026

Petitioner has the right to revive the contempt case as circumstances warrant.

Headnote:This contempt case was presented for admission and was subsequently not pressed by the petitioner, who reserved the right to revive it if necessary. The court closed the case, allowing the petitioner liberty to take action in the future.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ASWIN B. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DR.SADIQ A. – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 420 OF 2026 | WP(C) NO.3280 OF 2026