SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13034

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
ASWIN B. RAJ – Appellant
Versus
DR.SADIQ A. – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.MANU RAMACHANDRAN, SRI.M.KIRANLAL, SRI.R.RAJESH (VARKALA), SRI.T.S.SARATH, SHRI.SAMEER M NAIR, SRI.MANOJ RAJAGOPAL, SMT.SAILAKSHMI MENON, SMT. AASHI K. SHAJAN, SHRI.HAFEEZ MUHAMMED, SMT.BINITHA MARIA THOMAS, SMT.AKZA SUSAN BENCY
For the Respondents: SMT.NISHA GEORGE

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is not pressing the contempt case for the time being.

Reserving the liberty of the petitioner to revive the same if circumstances so warrant, this contempt of court case is closed.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top