SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13035

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
CHINMAYA VIDYALAYA VIDYANAGAR KASARGOD – Appellant
Versus
DR SANYAM BHARDWAJ – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 429 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SURESH KUMAR KODOTH
For the Respondents: SRI.AJIT JOY

Compliance with court directions negates the need for contempt proceedings.

Headnote:The Court analyzed the compliance status of the directions issued in the judgment dated 03.02.2026 in W.P.

(C) No.3941 of 2026. Both parties stated that all directions have been complied with, leading the Court to determine that the contempt case is not necessary to pursue. The primary issues concerned the compliance of earlier orders and the rationale reflects the Court's acceptance of compliance as sufficient grounds. Consequently, the Court closed the contempt case.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondents submits that the directions in the judgment dated 03.02.2026 in W.P.(C) No.3941 of 2026 has been complied with and, therefore, there is no reason to pursue the contempt.

In view of the above, this Contempt Case is closed.

sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top