SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13036

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
SREEJITH.K.R. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 2678 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.P.BHASKARAN, SMT.AMBIKA M.
For the Respondents: ADV.GAYATHRI KRISHNAN

Court mandated timely consideration of eligibility criteria for educational program admission based on petitioner's qualifications.

Headnote:The case pertains to a writ petition where the petitioner, a B.Tech graduate, sought clarification on eligibility criteria for M.A. Clinical Psychology offered by IGNOU. Following a delay in response to the petitioner's representation, the Court directed the respondent to address the issue expediently within two months. The pertinent issues revolve around entry requirements for the Master's program based on the petitioner's qualifications, emphasizing the Court's direction for timely consideration and action.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's qualifications in question. (Para 1 , 2)
2. court's directive for respondent's action. (Para 3)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is a B.Tech graduate from University of Calicut. He has obtained admission for M.A. Psychology through distant education under Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) during the academic year 2023-2024. Petitioner has already completed his first year of study in M.A. Psychology. In the meantime, petitioner submitted Exhibit-P6 representation before the third respondent seeking a clarification as to whether his qualification is an eligible criteria for M.A. Clinical Psychology conducted by IGNOU. Though the request was submitted on 25.07.2025, till date, no reply has been received. 2. According to the petitioner, though the entry requirement for M.A. Clinical Psychology was B.A/B.SC degree in Psychology from a University recognised by the UGC with a minimum of 55% marks in aggregate, a doubt has arisen as to whether the B.Tech Degree possessed by him would satisfy the minimum entry requirement. Petitioner claims that he has also passed the first year of Master’s programme with more than 55% marks, which also satisfiies the criteria of entry requirement.

3. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Central Government Counsel, I am of the view that this writ petition can be disposed of with a direction to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P6 request made by the petitioner.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the third respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exhibit-P6, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top