VISHNUPRIYA S. vs MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13038

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
VISHNUPRIYA S. – Appellant
Versus
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.K.U.SWAPNIL, SMT.SWETHA BIJUMON, SHRI.RASSAL JANARDHANAN A., SRI.P.R.AJAY, SHRI.ABHISHEK M. KUNNATHU, SHRI.MOHAMMED SHAD K.A., SHRI.PRANAV USHAKAR
For the Respondents: SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI, SURIN GEORGE IYPE, SRI.CYRIAC KURIAN, SMT.ELIZEBATH GEORGE, SHRI.EMMANUEL CYRIAC

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

sd/-

BECHU KURIAN THOMAS JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13038

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBECHU KURIAN THOMAS, JVISHNUPRIYA S. – AppellantVersusMAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
VISHNUPRIYA S. – Appellant
Versus
MAHATMA GANDHI UNIVERSITY – Respondent