SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13043

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Devan Ramachandran, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
ASHIQUA – Appellant
Versus
ABDUL SALAM – Respondent
MAT.APPEAL NO. 19 OF 2026 | OP(HMA) NO.106 OF 2020 | OP(OTHERS) NO.214 OF 2020



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN, SMT.S.INDU, SHRI.GOVIND H. NAIR

The court confirmed that an appeal can be dismissed if the appellants express non-intent to pursue it.

Headnote:In this judgment, the Court addressed a matrimonial appeal, where the appellants, represented by their counsel, expressed their intention not to pursue the appeal, leading to its dismissal for being not pressed. The court highlighted the procedural aspect of withdrawal of appeals. The primary issue was framed around the intentions of the appellants concerning their appeal. The court rationalized that once the appellants indicated non-pursuit, the appeal stood dismissed. The final decision established the procedural rule validating withdrawal of appeals.

Devan Ramachandran , J.

The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that his clients do not intend to press this appeal. He added that a memo to this effect has also been filed on 11.02.2026.

In the afore circumstances, this Mat.Appeal is dismissed as having become not pressed.

Sd/- DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN Sd/- M.B. SNEHALATHA stu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top