SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13046

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
EASWARAN S., J
R.BENSIGAR – Appellant
Versus
RAVEENDRAN – Respondent
MSA NO. 2 OF 2009 | A.S. NO.123 OF 2006 | O.P.(INSOLVENCY) NO.5 OF 2001



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.G.SUDHEER
For the Respondents: SMT.BINDU MOHAN, SMT.K.R.RIJA, SRI.SUMAN CHAKRAVARTHY

An appeal may be dismissed for non-prosecution if the appellant's counsel lacks instructions to proceed.

Headnote:The matter concerns M.S.A No. 2 of 2009. The appellant presented his case, but his counsel lacked instructions to proceed. The court determined that without representation, the appeal could not continue. The final ruling dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution.

EASWARAN S., J --------------------------------------------

M.S.A.No.2 of 2009 --------------------------------------------

Dated this the 20th day of February, 2026 JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has no instructions from the appellant. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non prosecution.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top