SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13054

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. NATARAJAN, JOHNSON JOHN, JJ
EX NO. 9715381 AC (U/T) JAYASANKARAN T – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR SINGH IAS (KL:1989) – Respondent
CON.CASE(C) NO. 2625 OF 2025 | WP(C) NO.23051 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.GYOTHISH CHANDRAN
For the Respondents: SHRI.C.D. DINESH, CENTRAL GOVERNMENT COUNSEL

Compliance with court orders extinguishes contempt proceedings while allowing future recourse if necessary.

Headnote:Contempt of Court was filed by the petitioner for willful disobedience of the court's judgment in WP

(C) No.23051/2024 dated 29.05.2025. The respondents submitted compliance with court orders, leading to considerations by the court. The court noted compliance and allowed the contempt case to be closed, granting liberty for the petitioner to approach the court in future needs. Final outcome: contempt case closed with liberty for future recourse.

Table of Content
1. petition for contempt due to disobedience of a court order. (Para 1)
2. respondents provided compliance with the court's judgment. (Para 2 , 3)
3. court acknowledges compliance, allowing closure of contempt. (Para 4)

K. NATARAJAN, J.

This Contempt case is filed by the petitioner as against the respondents for willful disobedience of the judgment passed by this court in WP(C) No.23051/2024 dated

29.05.2025.

2. The learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the respondents submits that a memo has been filed along with the PPO issued by the respondents as per the direction of this Court.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the contempt case may be closed by granting liberty to approach the Court whenever the need arises.

4. The said submission and the document produced by the learned Central Government Counsel are placed on record.

In view of the compliance of the order of this Court, at present, the contempt case is closed by granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the court whenever need arises.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top