IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SASIKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with following prayers :
i) “Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, direction or order directing the 3rd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P2 application thereon within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court;
ii) To dispense with filing of translation of vernacular documents in the interest of justice.
iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of the case.” [sic]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P2 building permit by the 3rd respondent.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Pleader. The manner in which this writ petition is going to be disposed of, no notice is necessary to respondent Nos. 2 and 3. If respondent Nos.2 and 3 are aggrieved by any of the directions issued by this Court, they are free to file a review petition before this Court.
4. Since the limited prayer of the petitioners is to consider a building permit application submitted by the 3rd respondent, the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.