Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
DEVAN RAMACHANDRAN, M.B. SNEHALATHA, JJ
HAJARA SIYAD@ HAJARA ABDUL KHADAR – Appellant
Versus
SIYAD A.M. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of child's comfort with both parents. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. need for professional counseling amidst parental conflict. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT Devan Ramachandran, J.
The petitioners challenge Ext.P7 order of the learned Family Court, Ernakulam, solely because the daughter of the first among them has been directed to be given in interim custody of the 1st respondent – her father, every second Saturday from 10 A.M. till 5 P.M. Sunday; as also during the first half of Onam, Christmas vacations and first 15 days each during April and May Summer vacations. Though there is a further direction in the impugned order, that the father can talk to the child every Sunday between
07.00 to 7.30 p.m, this is not opposed by the mother.
2. We considered this matter on 18.02.2026, when we issued the following order, after interacting with both sides and the child.
The 1st petitioner and the 1st respondent were present before us in the morning today, along with the child.
2. We asked the child to be handed over to the 1st respondent to see her reaction; and we found her to be very comfortable and friendly. The arrangement continued till about 3 P.M, when we heard this matter again
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
