Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
SAJAN K A – Appellant
Versus
C P JAIN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to conviction under section 138 ni act. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. judicial scrutiny and limits of revisional power. (Para 5 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. outcome concerning modification of sentence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
K.BABU, J.
--------------------------------------
Criminal.R.P No.222 of 2026 ---------------------------------------
Dated this the 19th day of February, 2026 O R D E R The challenge in this Crl.Revision Petition is to the judgment dated 20.11.2025 in Crl.Appeal No.515 of 2024 passed by the Sessions Court, Kozhikode, confirming the conviction and the sentence rendered by the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-II, Thamarassery, in judgment dated 27.11.2024 in S.T No.55 of 2022.
2. Heard both sides.
3. The revision petitioner is the sole accused. He has been convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable instruments Act, 1881 (for short ‘the NI Act’) and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of three months. He was also directed to pay a fine of Rs.2,50,940/-.
4. Respondent No.1/complainant filed a complaint before the Trial Court alleging that the revision petitioner/accused executed Ext.P1 cheque for a sum of Rs.2,00,000/-. The complainant presen
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
