G. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI vs TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
G. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND, SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN, SRI.G.SHRIKUMAR (SR.)
For the Respondents: SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P), ADV S RAJMOHAN (SR GP)

Table of Content
1. writ petition becomes moot after the petitioner's death. (Para 1 , 2)

Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J.

When the matter was taken up, Sri. S. Subhash Chand, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner in this writ petition has unfortunately passed away.

2. The learned counsel submitted that in that view of the matter, no purpose would be served in pursuing the prayer sought in this Writ Petition which is one for extension of period of the Temple Advisory Committee.

In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document