SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13152

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V., K. V. JAYAKUMAR, JJ
G. GOPALAKRISHNA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 42002 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.S.SUBHASH CHAND, SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN, SRI.G.SHRIKUMAR (SR.)
For the Respondents: SRI.G.SANTHOSH KUMAR (P), ADV S RAJMOHAN (SR GP)

A writ petition becomes moot upon the death of the petitioner, necessitating its closure.

Headnote:The present writ petition sought an extension of the period for the Temple Advisory Committee. The petitioner's legal counsel reported the passing of the petitioner, indicating that pursuing the writ petition would serve no purpose. The Court determined that the writ petition should be closed as the petitioner is deceased.

Table of Content
1. writ petition becomes moot after the petitioner's death. (Para 1 , 2)

Raja Vijayaraghavan V., J.

When the matter was taken up, Sri. S. Subhash Chand, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submitted that the petitioner in this writ petition has unfortunately passed away.

2. The learned counsel submitted that in that view of the matter, no purpose would be served in pursuing the prayer sought in this Writ Petition which is one for extension of period of the Temple Advisory Committee.

In that view of the matter, this Writ Petition is closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top