SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13187

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
VIPINDAS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: A.JANI, MUHAMMED KHAISE J
For the Respondents: RENJITH GEORGE

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 25th day of February, 2026 This criminal appeal has been filed under Section 14A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 as amended in 2018 [hereinafter referred to as 'SC/ST POA Act, 2018' for short], challenging order dated 20.01.2026 in Crl.M.C. No.4084/2025 on the files of the Special Court for SC/ST (POA) Act cases, Manjery, whereby the learned Special Judge dismissed the anticipatory bail plea at the instance of the appellants, who are accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.1190/2025 of Changaramkulam Police Station.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the learned Public Prosecutor, in detail. Perused the verdict under challenge and the case diary placed by the learned Public Prosecutor. Even though, notice as mandated under Section 15A(3) of the SC/ST (POA) Act has been served upon respondent Nos.2 to 4, they did not appear.

3. Parties in this appeal shall be referred as ‘accused’ and ‘defacto complainant’, hereafter.

4. The prosecution allegation is that, at about 20.30 hours on 14.12.2025, the accused, being aware of the caste identity of the defacto complainant as a member of Scheduled Caste communit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top