Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MR. ANIL K.NARENDRAN, MURALEE KRISHNA S., JJ
IDA SAROJAM – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks construction permit for retaining wall. (Para 2) |
| 2. opponents argue illegal construction; claim need for consent. (Para 5 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court reviews submitted reports; identifies building violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. decision requires civil proceedings; writ petition dismissed. (Para 18 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
Muralee Krishna, J.
The petitioner filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:
“i) Call for the records which leads to the passing of Ext. P16 order and quash the same as illegal, arbitrary, unsustainable and one issued to flout the mandate contained in Exts.P3, P10 and P15 Judgments, Ext.P4 Permit and Ext.P6 report and sketch of the Expert Engineers, that too after ignoring the fact that proceedings were initiated under relevant provisions of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 , after issuing a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction;
ii) To issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the 4th respondent to issue permit for construction of Geocell retaining wall as suggested in Ext.P6 sketch an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
