Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
MADHUSOODANAN KAMALA BHAVAN, VELLAR, PACHALLOR DESOM, THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE – Appellant
Versus
BALU @ SURESH, ANI @ ANIL KUMAR, KOZHIYALA VIJAYAN @ VIJAYAN, ASOKAN, SUNATHAN @ APPOLA MELETHATTU PUTHENVEEDU, PREM SUJITH @ SUJITH, ANIL KUMAR, STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
CRL.REV.PET NO.1011 OF 2008

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY
For the Respondents: SRI.G.SUDHEER - PP

A petitioner may withdraw a criminal revision petition, leading to its closure without further proceedings.

Headnote:The revision petitioner, Madhusoodanan Kamala Bhavan, expressed disinterest in continuing with the petition, resulting in the court's order to close the proceedings. The court recognized the counsel's submission and concluded the matter accordingly, providing a clear resolution to the petitioner's request.

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is not interested in proceeding with this petition. For the above reason, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner requested to close the proceedings in this revision petition.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the proceedings in this revision petition stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :