SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13192

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
G. GIRISH, J
MADHUSOODANAN KAMALA BHAVAN, VELLAR, PACHALLOR DESOM, THIRUVALLAM VILLAGE – Appellant
Versus
BALU @ SURESH, ANI @ ANIL KUMAR, KOZHIYALA VIJAYAN @ VIJAYAN, ASOKAN, SUNATHAN @ APPOLA MELETHATTU PUTHENVEEDU, PREM SUJITH @ SUJITH, ANIL KUMAR, STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.P.MADHAVANKUTTY
For the Respondents: SRI.G.SUDHEER - PP

ORDER

The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that the revision petitioner is not interested in proceeding with this petition. For the above reason, the learned counsel for the revision petitioner requested to close the proceedings in this revision petition.

Recording the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the revision petitioner, the proceedings in this revision petition stand closed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top