SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13193

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
PUSHAPAMANI O.B. – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 28561 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.SANDHYA RAJU
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU, GP.

Writ petitions may be dismissed as not pressed when parties choose not to pursue them.

Headnote:This writ petition was submitted by the petitioner who has not pressed it, leading to the court's decision. The court recorded this submission and dismissed the writ petition as not pressed. The pertinent issue was whether the petition warranted further consideration, which was determined negatively. The ruling effectively concludes the matter without further inquiry.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition is not pressed. This is recorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top