SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13199

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
COMMUNIST MARXIST PARTY (KERALA STATE COMMITTEE) – Appellant
Versus
ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.GEORGIE JOHNY, SMT.ANITA ANN GEORGE
For the Respondents: SRI. DEEPU LAL MOHAN, SC FOR R1 TO R3

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a political party registered under Section

29A of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 . The grievance of the petitioner is that, despite filing a representation as Ext.P2, seeking relaxation of the conditions in Paragraph 10B of the Election Symbols Reservation and Allotment Order, 1968, no orders have been passed by the said authority, till date. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the hearing had concluded as early as in December 2025 and till date no orders have been passed.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Standing Counsel for respondents 1 to 3.

4. Having heard the respective counsel, I am of the view that the writ petition can be disposed of by directing the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 in a time bound manner.

Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top