IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
REMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 314 OF 2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review of conditions placed on convicts regarding familial access. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court finds current restrictions unsustainable based on prior judgment. (Para 3) |
JUDGMENT
The prayers in this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India are as follows:-
i. Issue a writ in the nature of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 2nd respondent to lift the condition whereby the prisoner is restricted from entering into Ottapalam Police Station limits.
ii. To grant any such other and further relief as this Hon’ble court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case to meet the ends of justice.
iii. To dispense with the production of English Translation of vernacular documents in the writ petition.
2. The petitioner is the mother of a convict. The petitioner’s son by name Vinod, S/o. Radhakrishnan (Convict No.208/2023) is undergoing imprisonment in S.C. No. 698/2019 on the file of the Addl. Sessions Court, Ottapalam, Palakkad, at the Central Prison and Correctional Home, Thavanoor. The convict has been granted ordinary leave as per Ext. P2 order. The grievance of the petitioner is that, while granting ordinary leave, the convict has been restrained from entering the territorial limits of Ottapalam Police Station, where his family house is situated. The grievance of the petitioner is that, in view of the condition imposed in Ext. P2 order, the convict is unable to enjoy the fruits of the ordinary leave. It is submitted that this restriction curtails his right to go to his family house, where his aged parents are residing. The learned counsel relied on Ext. P6 judgment in W.P. (Crl.) No. 1390 of 2025 dated 22.10.2025, to contend that the condition imposed in Ext. P2 is not legally sustainable.
3. Having regard to the circumstances brought out, I feel that the condition in Ext. P2 to the effect that the convict shall not enter the territorial limits of Ottapalam Police Station is unsustainable.
4. The writ petition is allowed as follows:
The condition in Ext. P2 to the effect that the petitioner’s son/convict shall not enter the jurisdictional limits of Ottapalam Police Station, is quashed. The petitioner’s son/convict is free to enter the jurisdictional limits of Ottapalam Police Station.
Sd/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.