Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SHAJITHA RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
DCB BANK LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1904 OF 2026

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.RESHMI VIJU, SHRI.ARJUN P.P.

Writ petitions can be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws their intent to pursue the case.

Headnote:In WP

(C) No. 1904 of 2026, the petitioner, Shajitha Riyas, submitted that the writ petition is not to be pressed. The court, acknowledging the counsel's statement, dismissed the petition accordingly. The ruling exhibited the court's procedural adherence, following the stated submission without further examination into the merits of the case.

BASANT BALAJI J ======================

W.P. (C) No. 1904 of 2026 ========================

Dated 23^rd day of February 2026 JUDGMENT When the Writ Petition is taken up for consideration today, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner does not intend to press the writ petition.

Recording the above submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13212

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JSHAJITHA RIYAS – AppellantVersusDCB BANK LIMITED – RespondentWP(C) NO. 1904 OF 2026

Writ petitions can be dismissed when the petitioner withdraws their intent to pursue the case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
SHAJITHA RIYAS – Appellant
Versus
DCB BANK LIMITED – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 1904 OF 2026