SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13214

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
ANOOP PULICKATHARA – Appellant
Versus
AUTHORISED OFFICER, STATE BANK OF INDIA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6420 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.TONY THOMAS
For the Respondents: SRI. JITHESH MENON

Writ petitions under SARFAESI Act can be dismissed as infructuous if interim orders are absent.

Headnote:The petitioner sought to quash sale notices under the SARFAESI Act, specifically those issued for auction. Due to absence of interim orders, the Court deemed the petition as infructuous, leading to dismissal. Key statutory references include Section 13(2) and 13(4) of SARFAESI Act. The Court ruled, confirming the dismissal of the writ petition.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 Exts.P4 to P6 notices are sought to be quashed in this writ petition.

The petitioner also sought for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the loan account. Ext.P4 to P6 are e-auction sale notices scheduling the sale on 01.03.2022.

Since there is no interim order passed by this Court, the prayers have become infructuous and the writ petition is dismissed.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top