Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13221

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
MINI ROSH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE BRANCH MANAGER SOUTH INDIAN BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38082 OF 2022

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SMT.SENITTA P. JOJO, SMT.JISHY P.S.
For the Respondents: SHRI.SUNIL SHANKER, SMT.VIDYA GANGADHARAN

The court identified that a writ petition becomes infructuous when the issues at hand are no longer live, leading to a dismissal.

Headnote:The High Court analyzed the SARFAESI Act and determined that the writ petition had become infructuous, leading to its dismissal. The petitioner submitted evidence regarding the bank's notices. The court concluded on the necessity of dismissal based on this finding. The final outcome is a dismissal of the petition as infructuous.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 23^rd day of February, 2026 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition has become infructuous.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous.

Sd/-

BASANT BALAJI JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13221

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMBASANT BALAJI, JMINI ROSH KUMAR – AppellantVersusTHE BRANCH MANAGER SOUTH INDIAN BANK – RespondentWP(C) NO. 38082 OF 2022

The court identified that a writ petition becomes infructuous when the issues at hand are no longer live, leading to a dismissal.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
MINI ROSH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
THE BRANCH MANAGER SOUTH INDIAN BANK – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 38082 OF 2022