ORDER

This review petition is preferred against the judgment dated 28.10.2025 in W.P.(C) No.35805/2025, wherein, at the concluding portion, the learned single Judge quashed Ext.P4 and Ext.P5 and directed the Vice Chancellor and the Governing Council to proceed with the recommendation of the Malpractices and Lapses Enquiry Committee [for brevity, ‘M&LEC’] in strict compliance with the procedure prescribed in the Kerala University of Health Sciences First Statutes.

2. Sri.P.Sreekumar, the learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of the review petitioner submitted that paragraph Nos.7 and 8 as well as the concluding portion of the judgment under review, indicate a clear error apparent on the face of the record, since, after rejecting the contention of the petitioners regarding absence of reasonable opportunity granted before the M&LEC, the learned single Judge proceeded to consider the validity of the show cause notice. It was submitted that, the procedure that followed the recommendation of M&LEC, what was found to be incorrect, but, in that process, quashed Ext.P4 without noticing that Ext.P4 was the recommendation of M&LEC.

3. Sri.P.Ramakrishnan, the learned counsel appearing for