SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13231

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
JACOB GEORGE AMPAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 8622 OF 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.M.S.AMAL DHARSAN, SHRI.NOEL JACOB
For the Respondents: S.RENJITH

The court affirmed the petitioner's right to claim and clarified tax obligations on adjusted land extent following government re-surveys.

Headnote:The petitioner sought a correction of land title from 20 cents to 15 cents due to a re-survey, later increased to 16.256 cents. The Court directed the Village Officer to accept tax for this new extent, reserving the petitioner's right to claim for the original area. The Court highlighted the necessity of resolving tax payment discrepancies and confirmed the interim Order allowing tax payments. The final direction ordered compliance within ten days, concluding the Writ Petition with the specified directions.

Table of Content
1. claim regarding land title and tax. (Para 1)
2. court's observation on petitioner's needs. (Para 2)
3. final decision on tax acceptance. (Para 3)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 23rd day of February, 2026 Petitioner claims title to 20 cents of land vide Ext.P1 document. However, pursuant to re-survey in the year 2017, the same has been reduced to 15 cents, as per records. The petitioner preferred Ext.P4 application seeking correction. In the meantime, the Village Officer refused to accept tax even in respect of the 15 cents, which culminated in an interim Order of this Court directing acceptance of tax with respect to the said 15 cents. Pending Writ Petition, Ext.P4 application was considered, and Ext.P8 Order has been passed, whereby the extent of the petitioner's property has been increased from 15 cents to 16.256 cents. Now, the short demand of the petitioner is to permit him to pay tax in respect of 16.256 cents, simultaneous with retaining his right to make appropriate claim in respect of the remaining extent, out of the original 20 cents.

2. Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Special Government Pleader on behalf of the respondents, this Court finds that the limited relief sought for by the petitioner is only to be allowed.

3. Accordingly, there will be a direction to the 4th respondent/Village Officer to accept tax (physically or online) from the petitioner in respect of 16.256 cents of land. Besides, the right of the petitioner to make appropriate claim in respect of the remaining extent, out of the original 20 cents, will also stand reserved. The direction to accept tax from the petitioner as indicated above shall be complied with, within a period of ten days from today (23.02.2026).

The Writ Petition (Civil) will stand closed with the above direction.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top