Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
C. JAYACHANDRAN, J
K.A.MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR THRISSUR – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 34622 OF 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. representation for compensation due to property acquisition. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. court directs timely compliance with representations. (Para 3) |
J U D G M E N T
Ext.P6 is a representation preferred by the petitioner seeking compensation in the below referred facts.
2. The property having an extent of 0.0008 hectares - forming part of 0.0015 hectares - of the petitioner was acquired by the State Government. Ext.P4 is the award passed. A portion of the petitioner’s shop room was also coming within the sweep of acquisition. While demolishing the said portion, the entire shop building collapsed. The petitioner sought for compensation in respect of the same vide Ext.P6.
However, no action ensued, is the short grievance.
3. Having heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader, this Court directs the 1st respondent District Collector to consider Ext.P6 in accordance with law and pass orders therein, expeditiously, at any rate, within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner will produce a copy of this judgment before the 1st respondent, for compliance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
