IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
HARISANKAR V. MENON, J
MARIYAM RASHEED – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner is stated to be the owner in absolute possession and enjoyment of 53.97 ares of property in Survey Nos. 60/1A3-8, 60/1B-3, 60/1B-4, 60/1B-5, 60/2-4, and 60/3- 8 of Puthenvelikkara Village, Paravur Taluk. The property, though a garden land, was mentioned as Nilam in the revenue records as well as in the data bank. The petitioner filed applications in Form 5 and Form 7 seeking to change the nature of the land before the 2nd respondent and also seeking to remove the property from the data bank, respectively. By Ext.P7, the Form-5 application is allowed partially with respect to the properties in Survey Nos. 60/2-4 and 60/3-8 having an extent of 9.24 ares and 8.09 ares, respectively. The application in Form-7 filed was also rejected. It is seeking to challenge the aforesaid that the petitioner is before this Court.
2. Heard Sri. V.A. Vinod, the learned counsel for the petitioner, as well as Smt. Sylaja S.L., the learned Government Pleader.
3. A perusal of the impugned order at Ext.P7 would show that the Form-7 application has been rejected solely on the basis of the report of the Agricultural Officer. The Form-5 application is also only partially allowed, without
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.