RAHIYA ANOOP vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13274

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAHIYA ANOOP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.LIBIN STANLEY, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL, SMT.R.GAYATHRI, SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA, SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE
For the Respondents: SRI.N.R.SANGEETHARAJ, PP

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. The permission sought for is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

K.BABU JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JRAHIYA ANOOP – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAHIYA ANOOP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent