Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAHIYA ANOOP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 245 OF 2025

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SRI.P.MOHAMED SABAH, SMT.SAIPOOJA, SRI.LIBIN STANLEY, SRI.SADIK ISMAYIL, SMT.R.GAYATHRI, SRI.M.MAHIN HAMZA, SHRI.ALWIN JOSEPH, SHRI.BENSON AMBROSE
For the Respondents: SRI.N.R.SANGEETHARAJ, PP

The court allows withdrawal of the writ petition upon the counsel's request, dismissing it accordingly.

Headnote:The court examined a writ petition where the petitioner sought permission to withdraw. Under ruling authorities, the petition was allowed to be dismissed as withdrawn. The primary legal question involved the appropriateness of withdrawal. The court concluded that permission is granted and dismissed the writ petition without further proceedings.

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the Writ Petition.

2. The permission sought for is granted. The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Sd/-

K.BABU JUDGE

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAMK. BABU, JRAHIYA ANOOP – AppellantVersusSTATE OF KERALA – RespondentWP(CRL.) NO. 245 OF 2025

The court allows withdrawal of the writ petition upon the counsel's request, dismissing it accordingly.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
K. BABU, J
RAHIYA ANOOP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WP(CRL.) NO. 245 OF 2025