SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13278

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
AHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 6025 OF 2026



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL, SMT.GOPIKA S. NAIR
For the Respondents: SRI. P.S. APPU

The court directed timely consideration of permit applications under the Motor Vehicles Act.

Headnote:The writ petition seeks directions under Section 87(1)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act regarding a temporary permit for the operation of a bus service. The court directed the second respondent to consider the application within three weeks. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Table of Content
1. petitioner seeks mandamus for permit consideration. (Para 1)
2. court directs timely processing of permits. (Para 2)

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers.

“i. Issue a writ of mandamus for other appropriate writs direction or orders directing the 2nd respondent to consider Exhibit P-4 application for temporary permit under Section 87 (1)(d) of the Motor Vehicles Act and issue the same enabling the petitioner to operate on the route Kozhikode-Palayam Bus Stand Via Areekode in respect of stage carriage KL 53 7788 till the renewal application is finally decided by the 1st respondent;

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus for other appropriate writs direction or orders directing the 1st respondent to consider Exhibit P-2 application for renewal of regular permit in respect of stage carriage KL 53 7788 to operate on the route Kozhikode-Palayam Bus Stand Via Areekode; iii. To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language;

iv. Render such other orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. Taking note of the fact that Ext.P4 application for a temporary permit is pending consideration before the second respondent, there will be a direction to the said respondent to pass orders on the same, in accordance with law, within three weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top