SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 13282

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
MOHAMMED NIAS C.P., J
SHINE MATHEW – Appellant
Versus
THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY – Respondent
WP(C) NO. 44883 OF 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: SHRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL
For the Respondents: SRI.AJIT JOY, SRI. P.S. APPU, GP.

The Traffic Regulatory Authority must ensure proper procedures are followed before implementing transport regulations affecting petitioner rights.

Headnote:The petitioners challenged the actions of the 6th respondent regarding the implementation of a one-way system affecting their stage carriages, asserting non-compliance with procedural requirements as per extant transport regulations. The court directed that the Traffic Regulatory Authority must decide on the petitioners' representation following proper procedure. The primary issue addressed was whether the one-way system was appropriately imposed and if the Traffic Regulatory Authority followed judicial protocols in its deliberations. The court reasoned that due diligence in decision-making processes must be upheld, leading to a directive for timely consideration of the petitioners' complaints.

Table of Content
1. the validity of the one-way system. (Para 1)
2. proper procedure for decision-making must be adhered to. (Para 2)

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners are aggrieved by the alleged actions of the 6th respondent, Station House Officer of Gandhi Nagar Police Station, Kottayam District, in implementing a one-way system at Peroor junction as far as the stage carriages of the petitioners bearing registration Nos. KL-5X-2375, KL-5Z-0025, KL-5AL-4079, KL-5Y-6128 and KL-44B 2937, which are permitted to operate on the route Kottayam- Ettumanoor Via Samkranthi and Peroor, without the matter being considered by the Traffic Advisory Committee or the Regional Transport Authority. The petitioners had preferred Ext.P8 representation before the Traffic Regulatory Authority, the 3rd respondent.

2. Taking note of the fact that the Traffic Regulatory Committee comprises the Regional Transport Officer and the District Police Chief, and also the Chairperson of the Local authority, there will be a direction to the 3rd respondent Authority to take a decision, in accordance with law, on Ext.P8 with notice to the petitioners and all other affected persons within one month from the date of receipt of a copy of the judgment.

SD/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top