The court ensures compliance with procedural fairness in permitting vehicle operations and mandates timely resolution.

JUDGMENT

The writ petition is filed with the following prayers:-

“I. issue a writ of Mandamus or other appropriate writs, directions or orders directing the 2^nd respondent to settle the timings proposed by the 3^rd respondent by convening a timing conference and that the permit to the 3^rd respondent can be issued only with the timings settled in the timing conference;

II. Declare that the attempt to issue the regular permit to the 3^rd respondent with the proposed set of timings by the 2^nd respondent is illegal and is against the decision of the 1^st respondent itself;

III. To dispense with the production of English Translation of documents which are in vernacular language;

IV. Render such other orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”

2. The learned Government Pleader on instructions submits that though the timing conference was adjourned once, a request for replacement of the vehicle was made by the 3^rd respondent, and thereafter, a timing conference was held on 28.01.2026, and the orders are awaited. The above submissions are recorded.

3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of, directing the competent authority to settle the timing as regards the stage carriage of the 3^rd respondent as per the decision taken/to be taken in the meeting that was held on 28.01.2026, without further delay.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/-