IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
NIJEESH K.B – Appellant
Versus
MANKARA GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:
"(i) a writ of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction to call for the records leading to Exhibit-P4 letter and quash the same. (ii)Declare that the respondents cannot insist for a layout permit/plan, as done by the Exhibit-P4 letter, for considering the petitioner Exhibit-P3 application;
(iii) Issue a writ order of mandamus or any other writ, direction or order directing the 2nd respondent to consider and take appropriate decision on the Exhibit-P3 application, within a reasonable time.
(iv) Dispense with filing of translation of documents in Malayalam;
(v) To pass such appropriate orders that this Hon’ble Court may deem appropriate in the facts and circumstances of the case "
[SIC]
2. The petitioner submitted an application for building permit. But, the same was rejected, stating that the petitioner has to produce layout permit/plan because it is included in the plot sub-division. Aggrieved by the same, this writ petition is filed.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner.
Even though notice is issued to the respondents, there is no appearance for the respondents.
4. After hearing the counsel appeari
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.