The court affirms timely consideration of administrative applications under relevant rules.

JUDGMENT

The above Writ Petition (C) is filed with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Exhibit P5 stop memo issued by the 4^th respondent.

ii. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 1^st and 2^nd respondents to consider Exhibit P7 Form 7 application pending before the 1st and 2nd respondents within a stipulated time after considering the relevant fact of the property situated in survey numbers survey No. 517/6-2, 517/5-2 and 517/7 in Thazhava Village is not included in exhibit P3 data bank.

iii. Issue such other writ, order or direction which this Honourable Court deems fit in the nature and circumstances of the case."

[SIC]

2. When this Writ Petition came up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner will be satisfied if a direction is issued to consider Ext.P7 Form – 7 application within a time frame.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.

4. After hearing both sides, I think there can be a direction to consider Ext.P7 application within a time frame.

Therefore, this Writ Petition is disposed of in the following manner:

1. The 4^th and 5^th respondents are directed to submit the necessary report based on the Ext.P7 application to the 2^nd respondent/Authorised Officer, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment.

2. The 2^nd respondent/Authorised O to consider Ext. P7 application (if it is pending and if it is in order) based on the report received from the 4^th and 5^th respondents, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the report.

3. The petitioner will produce a certified copy of this judgment, along with a copy of this Writ Petition with exhibits, before the 2^nd, 4^th and 5^th respondents for compliance.

Sd/-

P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN JUDGE GBG

2013 OF OCHIRA SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE DATED 30.1.2013 Exhibit P2 TRUE COPY OF THE TAX RECEIPT DATED